關於本會
環保項目
教育項目
米埔
海下灣
齊來參與
兒童園地
資料庫
English
搜尋
 
米埔
概覽
  基圍
  候鳥
  米埔管理計劃
  拉姆薩爾濕地管理計劃
野生動植物
研究及監測
米埔濕地保育
參觀米埔
最新資訊
你的協助


米埔標誌:斑點魚郎

米埔 - 最新資訊

有關雀鳥資料更新

Saemangeum project update (18 August 2003)

More on the 40,000 ha reclamation project underway at Saemangeum, in the Republic of Korea, which will reclaim one of the premier staging sites for waders migrating up the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. Development was recently halted, but an appeal against the halt will be heard on 26 August (postponed from 18 August). Perhaps in anticipation of this, the Korean Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries has set up a website explaining the ecologically friendly benefits of this reclamation: http://www.maf.go.kr/maf_eng/issue/issue2.htm

The statements on the site include:
"Some argue the Saemangeum Project destroys the environment, but we should consider the reclamation project as an environment conversion one to change tidal flats to farmland. Just like tidal flats, farmland is a habitat for numerous living things and possesses various public-good functions to foster water resources, to prevent floods, to purify the air, and to provide pleasant scenery."

"The Saemangeum Project raises a question whether to choose either tidal flats or rice fields in our times. Selecting rice fields rather than tidal flats does not destroy the environment. Since we have confirmed that a tidal flat is formulated over time, we will have another tidal flat as time goes by, but we will not have enough farmland in the future if we do not attain it now.

Ornithologists also expect many migratory birds to inhabit the Saemangeum region thanks to the well-suited agricultural freshwater lake and farmland created by the project, which should provide good food and habitat."

This clearly give you an idea of the kind of information that the Korean government will be providing the appeal hearing to support their case for the reclamation. Firstly, the need for further farmland is debatable when South Korea is supposed to be producing a surplus of rice each year and secondly, farmland would support a very different variety, and lower number of birdlife that the original mudflat habitat would support and for which the Saemangeum mudflat is internationally important.

For those who have not yet signed the on-line petition against the reclamation, it's still active at http://www.wbkenglish.com/saemref.asp (over 5000 signatures from 66 countries so far). That site also provides more information on the birds and responses from the international community.

Or you can also join WWF International e-petition:
Panda Passport: http://passport.panda.org
Select a campaign titled "Stop destruction of vital bird habitat".