On July 13th, 2005 WWF met the Chief Executive, Mr Donald Tsang, to
outline the basic proposals of our SOS Campaign and to lay out a possible
new economic model for the north-east waters of Hong Kong to present
a win-win proposal for conservation and the local community.
| |
.jpg)
Port Shelter
© Adam Minu |
|
We proposed to designate Tolo Harbour, Port Shelter and all marine parks
as "no-take" zones, where all fishing is banned. The no-take
zones currently proposed by AFCD in the Fisheries Protection Ordinance
would amount to only 2% of Hong Kong’s territorial waters and the
impact will be negligible. Our proposed no-take zones would cover 9.8%
of Hong Kong’s territorial waters.
We cited Goat Island Reserve in New Zealand as a successful example
of no-take zones where the largest snapper are eight times the size of
snapper outside the Reserve, and 14 times more numerous. We also emphasized
that while the local fishermen were originally opposed to the no-take
declaration, they are now the strongest proponents of the policy. The
reason is because their economic well-being has actually improved either
with new jobs in the tourist industry or through improved value of their
fish catch.
We also stressed that some initial investment will be needed such as
compensation for the local fishermen for loss of income from fishing
in the no-take areas and retraining programmes for fishermen for their
potential new roles. We are confident that the longer-term economic benefits
to the local communities will far outweigh these costs.
We have explained our proposals to a selected group of fishermen representatives.
We have emphasized that WWF is not seeking to destroy their livelihoods,
rather we are trying to improve them through a system of sustainable
fishery management.
We will now be presenting our revised proposals to our Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department to explain in detail the benefits
from our stance. We will stress to AFCD that they must take a proactive
role in conserving our marine habitat, and that some tough decisions
are required. We may be calling upon your support to add some public "weight" to
our arguments.
After our presentation to AFCD, our next step is to continue our communications
with the government, fishermen groups, Tai Po and Sai Kung District Boards
and legislators to get their support for the proposal. It is our intention
to involve as many groups as possible in our solution to this marine
threat.
|